This video explains the explanation why the early Vedic Indians didn’t invoke Brahman straight within the rituals though they have been conscious of His existence. It will not be right to imagine that the early Vedic Indians had no data of a common supreme God. The early Vedic faith has components of monotheism. There are verses within the Rigveda extolling and figuring out the unity of the complete universe and the unity underlying all of the divinities know to the Vedic individuals. Though they have been conscious of the prinicple of monotheism they did not worship a single unitary God at that time of time in historical past as a result of the best supreme Brahman was an impersonal God. He’s an impersonal God who can’t be communicated, who’s past the thoughts and the senses, who can reached solely by means of the interior Self. So for the Vedic clergymen, who have been within the mundane features of human life, and who tried to invoke the assorted divinities by means of invocations and prayers, invoking Brahman was not a really perfect name as a result of Brahman would not reply to the invocations. He’s incommunicable, besides by means of the meditative and contemplative means. That’s the reason we don’t discover any invocations to Brahman within the Vedas. However after we go to the Upanishads, the top a part of the Vedas, we discover very frequent references to Brahman. as a result of within the contemplative mode, Brahman is the final word objective. Logically talking you can not talk with Brahman as a result of Brahman is common, infinite, absolute. He’s past the languages, past the phrases and kinds, past the fabric manifestations, which we expertise by means of our senses. Brahman doesn’t talk with anybody as a result of there’s nothing to speak; the whole lot exists inside Himself. Brahman doesn’t talk as a result of there isn’t any duality in His absolute state; there isn’t any distinction between the knower and the realizing, or the knower and the recognized. Brahman isn’t topic to predicate relationships. So logically talking it isn’t potential to speak with Brahman or for Brahman to speak with individuals or anybody else. Within the Upanishads and within the Vedas we discover that even the divinities weren’t acquainted with Brahman. Within the Kena Upanishad when Brahman confronts the divinities Indra, Agni and Vayu, they might not fathom who He was. It was solely once they hear about from Uma Haimavathi they arrive to learn about Him. And since Indra was the primary God who went closest to Him, he grew to become the chief of the Devas or the chief of the heavens. From this it’s clear that the Vedic students of the Rigvedic instances have been conscious of the difficulties in understanding Brahman, in approaching Him and invoking Him. So they didn’t hassle to refer Him within the prayers or search His assist. Slightly they frolicked invoking lesser divinities who they thought have been useful and simpler to method. It was solely within the later instances the impersonal Brahman grew to become private, in all probability due to the affect of bhakti motion or the devotional motion and the rising recognition of Vaishnavism and Saivism. And when the impersonal Brahman grew to become the private God within the type of both Vishnu, Siva or Brahma, then we discover that the unmanifest, unknowable, Brahman assumed some qualities and distinct personalities whereby individuals may relate to Him, invoke Him and search His help in human endeavors. I imagine it’s fallacious to presume that the Rigvedic individuals had no data of supreme, common God. They’d data of Him. Simply, they did not talk with Him and they didn’t invoke Him straight within the prayers.